Theme Development in the Film 12 Angry Men

Theme ontogeny in the Film 12 fierce Men\n\nIn the ikon 12 Angry Men a finding of detail of not guilty was given(p) to the son after the fact that apparently all the jurors eject unmatchable thought that the male child was guilty beyond a sane doubt. All of the get a line narrate presented in the judgeship was rejected by the jury, which take the jurors to have a reasonable doubt about the male childs guiltiness. I adept present this tell apart in chronological order and live why there is a reasonable doubt that would malarky each juror to reposition their view of the field. In my picture some of the counter evidence presented was kind of weak, but the self-coloured baksheesh of this paper is to fork out the trail of evidence to atomic number 82 the jurors to a reasonable doubt.\n\nThe first gear advert idea, and in all probability the about important, is that the son was poor and couldnt afford a overnice lawyer. He had a approach appointed attorney who probably had many other cases to argue. This attorney had no attachment to the guest; there was no renown that the attorney could look towards. The attorney would really have to suppose in the client in order to deliberate the case properly. It was pointed out in the movie that the boy had a rattling poor attorney and didnt ask the right questions. If the boy had a good attorney, he would of brought up all the points that countered the key evidence that some of the jurors pointed out.\n\n at that place are a hardly a(prenominal) points about the knife that would lead to reasonable doubt. One point made in the lawcourt was that the person who sold the boy the knife said it was one in a kind. It would be highly unlikely that other person would have the analogous knife. However juror #8 went to the area where the boy lived and bought the corresponding exact knife from a pawnshop. This would prove that the knife wasnt one of a kind, it was moderately common. This means th at anyone could\n\nhave bought the aforesaid(prenominal) knife and used it to veil the boys father. This evidence proves that the knife that the boy purchased wasnt necessarily the murder limb.\n\nAn enkindle question was brought up by one of the jurors. Why did the boy show the murder weapon to his friends just a tally of hours before the murder in truth occurred? If he...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:

Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.