.

Thursday, January 31, 2019

Capital Punishment Essay: Clarifying Impressions of Death Penalty :: Argumentative Persuasive Topics

Clarifying Impressions of enceinte Punishment There are many false impressions floating to the highest degree through American society concerning the close punishment this paper hopes to explain some of the more prominent, noticeable ones. Does the death penalty deter? scientific studies consider consistently failed to find convincing order that the death penalty deters crime more effectively than other punishments. The most recent work of research findings on the relation between the death penalty and homicide rates, conducted for the linked Nations in 1988 and updated in 1996, concluded Research has failed to provide scientific confirmation that executions have a greater deterrent effect than life internment and such proof is unlikely to be forthcoming. The evidence as a whole still gives no positive support to the deterrent hypothesis...(Hood 238) Reviewing the evidence on the relation between changes in the use of the death penalty and crime rates, a study conduct ed for the United Nations in 1988 and updated in 1996 say that the fact that all the evidence continues to point in the same mission is persuasive a priori evidence that countries need not fear emergent and serious changes in the curve of crime if they reduce their reliance upon the death penalty.(Edwin) Recent crime figures from abolishmentist countries fail to show that abolition has harmful effects. In Canada, the homicide rate per 100,000 population fell from a blossoming of 3.09 in 1975, the year before the abolition of the death penalty for murder, to 2.41 in 1980, and since then it has declined further. In 1999, 23 years after abolition, the homicide rate was 1.76 per 100,000 population, 43 per cent lower than in 1975. The total number of homicides reported in the country fell in 1999 for the third straight year.(Hood 253) One of the most important developments in recent years has been the adoption of international treaties whereby states empower themselves to not hav ing the death penalty. Three such treaties now exist * The help Optional communications protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and semipolitical Rights, which has now been ratified by 46 states. Seven other states have signed the Protocol, indicating their intention to become parties to it at a later date. * Protocol No. 6 to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and key Freedoms (European Convention on Human Rights), which has now been ratified by 39 European states and signed by three others.

No comments:

Post a Comment