Attitude Survey Essay Example for Free

Attitude view EssayIn certain situations, it is important for psychologists to project the attitudes of people on different issues. Attitude evaluates are how psychologists gather learning ab show up attitudes of people. Then, they take this information and turn the results into empirical evidence to back up the theory or question that is impending. A someones attitude can affect thought and behavior processes such as cognitive thinking, activated reaction, and physical behaviors (Hogan, 2007). For my survey, I used the Likert method of attitude home base to develop my attitude assessment. I valued to find what the attitude of smokers and non-smokers have about the dope ban in restaurants. This paper pull up stakes ascertain and discuss the development of my survey, administration process, scoring of the surveys, and the interpretation of the scores. Also, issues that I had while designing the survey will be discussed.Attitude SurveyThe development of my survey was ta ken from an issue that I person solelyy was kindle in because I am a smoker. When the ban first became a law, I heard legion(predicate) people, including myself complain about the right to have a skunk section in restaurants for individuals who smoked. The ban has right off been in effect for a few years, and I wanted to find out if smokers and non-smokers attitudes had changed on this issue.Survey DesignIn designing my survey, I used the Likert scale because I felt it would be the beat out way to gather the information I needed. This survey was designed to see how people view smoking in restaurants. These questions were reacted by 6 different people, of which 3 were smokers and 3 were non-smokers. The surveyors were asked to answer each question by stating strongly agree, agree, undecided, disagree, or strongly disagree. The numerical scores for each question range from-2 to +2. garbage disposal, Scoring, and Interpreting ResultsAdministration consisted of me going to neighbo rs doors and asking them eleven questions about the smoking ban. I wanted to sham sure that there were not so many questions that it would take too long. The length of time administering the examen helped in getting people to take the time to answer these few short questions. The neighbors I chose were already acquainted with me as well, and that helped them to be comfortable and willing to answer my survey questions.For the scoring of the survey the set out the score the lower the satisfaction of the ban, and the higher the score implies the higher level of satisfaction. When I designed the survey I made sure that for each unfavorable answer of strongly disagree corresponded with a invalidating feeling towards the smoking ban. When interpreting the scores, usually it is better to have a good number of participants to answer the questions because it makes it more reliable to be able to look at the trends of how the questions are answered.Preliminary Design IssuesIssues that I ha d were trying to get enough people to answer my survey questions. I also had an issue of how to framing the scores and put them into a scale. It took me a little time to understand how to correctly design and score. I also wanted to ask the right questions, as well as keep the survey questions short, so that people did not get tired of answering questions before the end however, still embrace all the basic questions needed for this survey. I also did not want the questions to be as if I were retell myself, so this took me a little while to figure out how to properly word my questions so to grasp all the information I would need for scoring and interpretation.In conclusion, the survey I chose was to find out the attitudes of people on the smoking ban in restaurants. I used the Likert method of attitude scale for my design because I felt it was the best way to assess my selected issue. I tried to create questions that would cover cognitive factors, emotional responses, and physica l behaviors in order to accurately score and interpret the attitudes about the smoking ban issue amongst smokers and non-smokers alike.ReferencesHogan, T.P. (2007). Psychological testing A practical introduction (2nded.). Hoboken, NJ Wiley.